BOLU OWOLABI.PMP
Build · Bolu OS · Live

How I run my own operations with AI

One ranked queue in place of a dozen separate agent pings. Agents do the legwork on a schedule, a chief of staff agent sorts it, and every call that needs judgment comes to me.

RoleDesigner and operator
StartedNov 2026
StatusLive, running daily
Built onClaude
The short version
  1. I had scheduled agents doing real work for me, and each one reported on its own. Decisions piled up in lists nobody acted on.
  2. I set up a chief of staff agent over them and one ranked queue I clear from my phone, with rules I set and a log of every call.
  3. On the first night I cleared 24 decisions from that one queue. The system now learns from my reasons and brings rule changes back for my approval.
01 · The problem

More agents meant more noise, not fewer decisions

Running a market launch taught me that the work isn't the hard part. Deciding what matters today is. My agents were doing the work: scanning, drafting, checking, logging. But every one of them messaged me separately, on its own schedule, in its own format.

The cost showed up as items nobody decided on. One list I checked had 59 entries waiting without a single call made on any of them.

02 · How it runs

Agents do the legwork. I make the calls.

  1. 1
    Agents work on a scheduleEach one owns a lane and a time slot, and follows written rules for what it may and may not do.
  2. 2
    Everything lands in one logEvery run records what it did, what it found, and anything that failed, with a checkpoint so a crashed run picks up where it stopped.
  3. 3
    A chief of staff agent builds the queueTwice a day it pulls what needs my judgment, removes duplicates and ranks it by deadline and money at stake.
  4. 4
    I decideApprove, approve with edits, reject or snooze, each with a reason. From my phone, in batches.
  5. 5
    The chief carries out my callInside the rules, and logged. Anything that would message someone, pay for something or post publicly stays with me.
The learning loopEvery night, my edit and reject reasons get turned into plain rules. Any rule that would change how an agent behaves comes back to the queue for my approval first. It never changes itself.
03 · Two calls I made

Decisions and the options I turned down

One queue for everything

Turned down: a dashboard for each area. More places to check is the problem I was solving, not the answer.

Roll it out one agent at a time

Turned down: rewiring every agent the night it launched. The chief reads what the agents already log, and each agent switches over only after the one before it runs clean. Same way I'd open a new market: no big bang on a system that's working.

04 · AI and me

Who did what

Claude

  • Ran each agent's work on schedule
  • Built the queue page and the run logs to my spec
  • Drafted rules and fixes from my decisions

Me

  • Designed the system: lanes, chief of staff, one queue
  • Set every rule, limit and what stays off limits
  • Decide every judgment call and approve every rule change
  • Capped usage at a set number of runs a week, reported every Friday
05 · Results so far

Early numbers, straight from the logs

24decisions cleared from one queue on night one
1place to decide, in place of a dozen separate pings
2rules learned from misses in the first 24 hours
4agent runs logged on day one, 1 flagged as partial

AS OF NOV 8, 2026 · FIRST FULL WEEK OF NUMBERS POSTS NOV 15

06 · What broke

A run came back short, and said so

On day one, a research agent finished well short of its target because many of the sites it checked wouldn't load. It logged itself as partial with the reason, instead of failing quietly or padding the results.

That night the review turned it into a standing rule: check the most reliable public pages first, then the sites that often fail. A small fix, but it's the habit that matters. Every miss becomes a rule, and any rule that changes what an agent does comes to me first.

07 · See it

The same pattern on a fleet

My own queue holds private data, so I built a version you can click through: the same rules, ranking and approvals, pointed at a 150 vehicle fleet with made up data.